Socyberty > Economics

Why Athletes Get Paid So Much and We Don't

Ever wonder why athletes and movie stars get ridiculous salaries? Are the nation's priorities skewed or is there a good reason for it? Through simple economic principles, we find the reasoning behind it all.

A lot of people wonder why athletes and entertainers get paid so much.  You know the old cliché, how can we pay teachers so little but pay athletes $25 million to swing a bat?  It seems a little ridiculous, doesn’t it?

The reason for their inflated salaries lies in a fundamental concept of economics.  Basic economics states that people get paid in exchange for the services they provide their employers.   Having said that, another fundamental concept is the idea of service consumption and how it relates to salaries.  As an employee a company consumes your service.  Typically, only one company can consume your service at a time; therefore, only one income stream can be applied to that service per unit time.

Athletes and entertainers are different.  For them the service they provide is not consumed so much by their franchise or studio, but by sports fans and moviegoers.   Athletes provide a service which fans consume, not the franchise itself.  Movie stars provide a service that moviegoers consume, not so much the studio releasing the film.

The beauty of it is that the service can be consumed by more than one individual per unit time.  Think about it, a stadium of people watching A-Rod consumes his service at the same time, which means his service is available to thousands of people in unison.  Factor in television and you’ve got a service available to millions of people all at once.  The more consumers of your service per unit time means you have a greater source of income per unit time.  In other words, you can make millions of dollars while doing no more work than any other person.  The difference is the level of consumption of that service.

For famous people, the A-Rods and George Clooneys, the value added because of their expertise and fame only augments the fact that millions of people can consume their service at a single time.  For the average Joe, this is like having an MBA that a million companies are willing to pay for versus having an undergraduate degree consumed by millions of companies.  This explains the reason for the range of salaries in sports and entertainment.  Note, however, that even unknown relief pitchers command six-figure salaries due to the level of service consumption available to them.  The difference between them and Brandon Webb is expertise and command of the game.

That’s pretty much the reason behind it all.  It is not so much a case of skewed priorities in our society, but more an example of economics supporting the situation.  So next time somebody makes a comment about athletes’ salaries you can explain the economic underpinnings of it!

7
Liked It
I Like It!
Related Articles
Let "Em Play, Let "Em Play, Let 'em Pay  |  Have You Ever Wondered?
Latest Articles in Economics
Conservative Vs. Liberal Views: Top Down and Bottom Up Economics  |  The Death of Capitalism
Comments (6)
#1 by , May 23, 2008
Well, it's still a case of screwy priorities, because if we REALLY wanted to deflate their salaries, we'd stop watching until the prices lowered. Of course, if we could figure out how to raise everyone else's salary we wouldn't need to do that... Because really, a New York fireman probably services how many people? A high school teacher up to 700 students a year? (that's a figure from my school) The difference is these audiences have been told that they don't need to give money to these people

And while their audience is smaller, it still doesn't explain why incorporated engineers make more than them. I like your thinking, and from a purely economic standpoint it makes sense. But it doesn't discount our societal problems.
#2 by , May 23, 2008
Okay, re-rereading that, the part about engineers was an entirely different can of worms... I shouldn't have even gone there.
#3 by sam, May 23, 2008
nose bleed!!Hehehe
#4 by To post #1, May 23, 2008
Thank you for your comments. It is easy to make comparisons between teachers, fishermen, and other professionals who apparently have multiple people consume their service per unit time. This is not really the case, however.

The difference is that every single person in a stadium (or theater) pays to consume that service. Every child in a school does not pay to use the teacher\'s services, rather the tax revenue is what funds such services. Private schools are funded through tuition, but private schools are also ridiculously expensive and for the very reason we suggest here. I believe you alluded to this in the first paragraph, and that is the key difference.

Firefighters do not provide a service to millions in tandem (only one fire/emergency per unit time per firefighter). That\'s the difference. Is it possible for a firefighter to save multiple lives in a given situation? Yes. But it is not something he/she does every second of their job and it will not be for millions of people at a time.

The issue is not the availability of a service to millions of people, but the actual consumption of it by millions of people.

If we wanted to lower their salaries, yes, we could stop watching the games or movies. But the truth is that it does not really affect the public in any tangible way.

We should not be asking ourselves how we can lower athlete salaries, we should be asking ourselves how we can raise teacher salaries; if such is the concern.
#5 by nancy, May 23, 2008
nice explanation. still not sure they deserve what they get though!
#6 by Jack, Jul 27, 2008
Maybe I am a little confused... but it is my understanding that sport franchises and movie studios set salaries regardless of the amount actually obtained by the sporting event (number of consumers) or amount of moviegoers. So how are the consumers directly affecting the salary?
Post Your Comment:
Name:  
Copy the code into this box:  
Inside Socyberty

Activism

 /

Advice

 /

Crime

 /

Death

 /

Disabled

 /

Economics

 /

Education

 /

Ethnicity

 /

Folklore

 /

Future

 /

Gay & Lesbians

 /

Government

 /

History

 /

Holidays

 /

Issues

 /

Languages

 /

Law

 /

Lifestyle Choices

 /

Men

 /

Military

 /

Organizations

 /

Paranormal

 /

People

 /

Philanthropy

 /

Philosophy

 /

Politics

 /

Psychology

 /

Relationships

 /

Religion

 /

Sexuality

 /

Social Sciences

 /

Society

 /

Sociology

 /

Spirituality

 /

Subcultures

 /

Support Groups

 /

Work


Popular Tags
Popular Writers
Socyberty
About Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Services
Submit an Article
Advertise with Us
Contact

© 2007 Copyright Stanza Ltd. All Rights Reserved.