Socyberty > History

The Justification of Bombing Japan During WWII

To end WWII in 1945, the United States dropped two nuclear bombs, one on the Japanese city of Hiroshima, the other on the city of Nagasaki. The United States was justified in dropping the bombs.

Dropping the bombs resulted in fewer deaths than if the United States would have invaded the island. Years after the war, Secretary of State James Byrnes claimed that “500,000 American lives would have been lost” if the United States had invaded Japan. So many people would have died because the Japanese fought to the death because of the samurai code.

Also, the government was training the citizens to fight, therefore the United States army would have had to fight every Japanese citizen. The bombing resulted in only 110,000-210,000 people killed. Therefore, the United States was justified because it killed fewer people than an invasion would have.

One counter argument is that the United States was not justified in bombing because the Japanese were going to surrender before the bombs were dropped. Although Japan was willing to surrender, it would have been a conditional surrender. They would have kept the government, and Japan would have stayed unoccupied. If the United States had agreed, they would have lost millions of dollars fighting the war and gained nothing. Therefore, the United States was justified in the nuclear bombing, and ending the war, even though the Japanese were willing to surrender.

Although the nuclear bombs killed more civilians than an invasion would have, it was justified because it ended World War II quickly. During the war, civilians were dying throughout Japan at a rate of about 200,000 per month. The submarine blockade and the United States Army Air Forces's mining operation, Operation Starvation, had effectively cut off Japan's imports.

Historian Daikichi Irokawa once stated, "Immediately after the defeat, some estimated that 10 million people were likely to starve to death,". Also, firebombing had killed well over 100,000 people in Japan since February of 1945. Therefore, the nuclear bombing was justified because it ended the war quickly which saved millions from starvation and firebombing.

Although the nuclear bombs killed many Japanese civilians, and the Japanese were willing to surrender with conditions, dropping the bombs saved many American and Japanese lives.

8
Liked It
I Like It!
Related Articles
Atomic Bombs and World War II  |  Hiroshima and Nagasaki: Messages to Moscow
More Articles by ttop191
The 1950's  |  Causes of WWI
Latest Articles in History
The Visigoths Conquers Spain (500ad - 800ad)  |  Sacred Bounty, Sacred Land: Early Civilizations
Comments (12)
#1 by 123456789, Oct 26, 2007
yeah.
#2 by Miho, Jan 7, 2008
Pack of lies
#3 by Nick Hughes, Jan 24, 2008
A fairly weak answer, with mild arguments raised but with no real evidence to back it up. Also, the writing style is very poor. All arguments also have been lifted from the wikipedia page, but is less detailed.
#4 by Bill B, Apr 16, 2008
Everything stated in that argument is true. The answer is not at all a pack of lies. The American military had planned out the invasion of Japan and were ready to do it if they didnt surrender.And if America invaded, millions would of died.And i know that because EVERY military person agrees on that fact. So... yes.. no matter how you look at it, more lives were saved and the war ended quicker. They \"were trying to surrender\" doesnt mean anything. They DIDNT surrender..period.
#5 by John M., Apr 16, 2008
I am researching this topic for my highschool paper and i discovered that even after the first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima, the Japanese diplomats were still in discussion about surrendering. Hiroshima was a shot to the head, Nagasaki was the nail in the coffin. I agree with Bill, you don't try to surrender, if the Japanese were really trying to surrender, wouldn't they have surrendered?
#6 by Andrew, May 4, 2008
Bill and John are true patriots, I will always give my beloved country benefit of the dout.
#7 by Disgusted, May 23, 2008
We should be ashamed of ourselves. Two million Japanese killed in WWII by the allies. Mostly civilians. Firebombing large cities with no regard for targeting military installations. And then after nearly everyone has been killed in the major cities, why not drop a couple of nukes to finish them off?
#8 by Silence, May 25, 2008
I agree with Andrew :3
#9 by da trufe, Jun 8, 2008
we wur justified obviously we wuldnt hav dun it if we didint look into da prouz nd conz...
#10 by sam, Jun 10, 2008
actually, in interviews with the pilots and people on the planes they did not really look at the pros and con; they merely looked at thier own benefits. I believe that people arguing put more thought into it than the actual pilots.

Also, the bomb was made for Hitler. They used Japan as gunea pigs.
#11 by John, Jul 3, 2008
Ah, I see that the liberals are putting up another PMS attack.
#12 by John, Jul 3, 2008
The liberals have no arguments. They are all MOOT. Their anti-American attitude is sickening, yes, but their stupidity is really astounding.
Post Your Comment:
Name:  
Copy the code into this box:  
Inside Socyberty

Activism

 /

Advice

 /

Crime

 /

Death

 /

Disabled

 /

Economics

 /

Education

 /

Ethnicity

 /

Folklore

 /

Future

 /

Gay & Lesbians

 /

Government

 /

History

 /

Holidays

 /

Issues

 /

Languages

 /

Law

 /

Lifestyle Choices

 /

Men

 /

Military

 /

Organizations

 /

Paranormal

 /

People

 /

Philanthropy

 /

Philosophy

 /

Politics

 /

Psychology

 /

Relationships

 /

Religion

 /

Sexuality

 /

Social Sciences

 /

Society

 /

Sociology

 /

Spirituality

 /

Subcultures

 /

Support Groups

 /

Women

 /

Work


Popular Tags
Popular Writers
Socyberty
About Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Services
Submit an Article
Advertise with Us
Contact

© 2007 Copyright Stanza Ltd. All Rights Reserved.