In passing sentence on the issue of immigration one thing can be certain it is a “venture foredoomed to failure” the lack of voluntary or even compulsory restraint on the number of entrants has built up a national funeral pyre waiting to ignite.
Such inattentive decision making by government has been heaping up the disintegration in the communities where immigration has been imposed by the government through the dispersal of immigrants around the country and through the building and siting of detention centres in unrealistic locations.
The impact of immigration is felt more by local communities as the arrival of newcomers who are illiterate in English language and in conversing in English because of the failure by government to educate such people before they were transported to locations around the country.
Such central failures on the part of government impose extreme hardship on local schools and hospitals who have arrange translation services which in some small local authorities are quite a burden and such actions are bound to impact on “the common welfare of the community”.
A disruptive element of immigration is the tendency by government to provide preferential provision for the newcomers in quantifying the impact of immigration 500,000 people needing accommodation, jobs or social security benefits is a heavy burden for the collective peoples of Britain to bear and in some cases the question should be Why should they?.
The regime of preferences reduce the availability of social housing, reduce the availability of employment opportunities for those who want to work and allows such arrivals to absorb social security benefits and impose greater financial burden on an already expanding Pandora's Box of debt, criminality and poverty.
There is no hope of solving the problem of national cohesion whilst immigration continues like a tidal wave swamping Great Britain with additional citizens with such collective blindness one begins to wonder “what other national perils have those in authority kept silence on” the failure by government to regulate the inflow of entrants has led to a feeling amongst society of “have they taken leave of their senses”.
In looking at the government and the reasoning behind their policies you can detect the underlying theme “Expansion at all costs” a trait they have maintained for generations the maintenance of mass immigration in order to hold down the inflationary consequences of their expansionary policies. In short they have imported immigrants to fuel economic growth in order to remain in office.
Such deliberate connivance has begun lifting the lid of Pandora's Box that had kept the flower of national concern to a minimum in a personal reference I am somewhat relieved that the lid is finally coming off because now discussion, opposition and reversal can begin taking shape. When people say society was mortally wounded some 25years ago they should look at the damage inflicted by the strands of thought collectively known as “The Permissive Society” on the society turning a once cohesive society into a divided polarised society.
So through the process of logical deduction the solution required is stricter control of entry and more expansion of emigration in order that pressure on communities is alleviated. Integrating arrivals is the easiest solution but the not right solution immigration is an explosive just waiting to detonate its clock is ticking.
As Britain's population is set to increase by leaps and bounds and so long term retrospective repatriation may have to be considered. The contrived position of power held by government has enabled them, to loosen the fabric of society through bargaining away national unity in exchange for short term economic prosperity the legislation passed by government has entrenched differentiation and segregation.
Giving citizenship to migrants and immigrants which erodes the obligation principle of working towards it is flawed as once citizenship is granted it can never be revoked which sounds like inflexible thinking.
As projected by government statistics Britain's population will expand quite substantially in the next 50 years and so two levers will have to be applied: restrictions on the number of entrants allowed into Great Britain and increasing emigration by giving assistance such instruments would control the rise in immigration in the long term but also by reversing previous inflows of immigration by repatriation would also enable national unity to be enhanced.
Such repatriations would be void if 5years had lapsed since arrival the expanding levels of immigration contrary to popular opinion are cording the collective stability of Britain's communities.
In bearing the burden of immigration for much longer I say “the fuse has been lit and is coming close to detonation” from observation of the actions of government the migrant has the whip hand over the British native. “Immigration is a bomb rigged for explosion”.
For 10 years immigrants have been injected into Britain and without though to the consequences and the practical issues surrounding the education and housing of such arrivals. A plural racially and culturally diverse Britain is the better tomorrow but the breadth of culture already experienced by people in Britain is such as more would erode the interest in such cultures.
Such forums like the race equality commission are a gross misdemeanour imposed by government on society and such organisations have no place in Modern Britain what so ever.
The bubble of pretence that government has over immigration will burst and the aftershocks will be dire in severity.
