Socyberty > Philosophy

Philosophy

Human Nature and Estrangement
by Faulkner, May 27, 2008
The human nature in estrangement: Is disunity natural among human beings or do humans possess an inherent unity based on survival and interpretive means?
Comments(0)   Liked It: 0
The Problem of Freedom
by Zashuna, May 26, 2008
The problem of free will.
Comments(3)   Liked It: 1
The Power of Dreams
by Stuart Rose, May 25, 2008
Ever felt you needed a little inspiration or a new direction in life? Could it be that your dreams, or someone else's are shaping your waking life?
Comments(0)   Liked It: 0
The Power of Dreams
by Stuart Rose, May 25, 2008
Ever felt you needed a little inspiration or a new direction in life? Could it be that your dreams, or even someone else's are shaping your waking life?
Comments(0)   Liked It: 1
Six Ways to Start Thinking More Rationally
by tony pace, May 20, 2008
Techniques for Philosophy is understood as a rational investigation of principles and truths. Deep thinkers use certain techniques to analyze problems. But how can we begin to think more rationally?thinking.
Comments(1)   Liked It: 0
Storytelling: Food for Our Souls
by Erik Whitter, May 18, 2008
Why the various mediums of storytelling, such as books and movies, are so important to us as human beings.
Comments(0)   Liked It: 1
There's Nothing New Under the Sun
by notenoughfreetime, May 18, 2008
A gentle musing on the concept of originality and how the idea that there are no new ideas might affect writers, or at least, how it affects this one.
Comments(0)   Liked It: 0
IS THERE a God? 4
by eddiego65, May 18, 2008
The moral argument for the existence of God.
Comments(0)   Liked It: 0
Is there a God? 2
by eddiego65, May 18, 2008
The cosmological argument for the existence of God.
Comments(0)   Liked It: 0
What Didn’t Mary Know?
by Nearly Anonymous, May 18, 2008
This paper contends that Campbell’s and Jackson’s analyses of qualia carry no ontological weight, rely on a primary intuition with unclear origins, and lead to highly counterintuitive and worrying consequences. Nagel’s analysis, in contrast, necessitates none of the suspect results that come with Campbell’s and Jackson’s claims. Consequently, we should take Nagel’s account of qualia – which does not show physicalism to be mistaken – to be overwhelmingly preferable.
Comments(0)   Liked It: 0
«Prev 1234567...303132Next»
Sorted by:

Popular Philosophy Tags
Popular Philosophy Writers
Socyberty
About Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Services
Submit an Article
Advertise with Us
Contact

© 2007 Copyright Stanza Ltd. All Rights Reserved.