Socyberty > Politics

9/11 - The Truth

The truth about 9/11.

Page 1 of 2 | Prev 12Next»

You know what happened on September 11,2001, don't you? It might be the most terrifying day of your life. What I have to say might shock you and you could be outraged. But look at the evidence. After you read this you might change your mind about this world and that fateful morning.

The Pentagon

Theorists agree that since there was so little “aircraft” wreckage at the Pentagon, minimal damage to the Pentagon's lawn and outer walls, and no visible damage to the walls from the wings or stabilizers, it could not have been a Boring 757 but rather a cruise missile or a smaller aircraft. A larger section of the Pentagon's wall did collapse about half an hour after the initial explosion but the impact hole was much smaller than the one seen after the wall came down. Additionally, the plane supposedly hit light poles near the Pentagon but instead there is little damage; light bulbs were not broken and it appears as though the poles were ripped out of the ground and laid aside.

Many people suggest that there is no damage to the walls of the Pentagon because they say the wings collapsed back against the fuselage and slipped in through the hole. “No plane” advocates point out that pictures show a hole of less than 10 feet wide made by the object. This object exited on the other side of the three rings of buildings within the Pentagon.

“The official story says that this hole was made by the nose of the 757 or an engine. Those questioning this version say the nose of an aircraft is fragile and between the point of impact and the little whole where the object came out are three rings of buildings in an area of he pentagon that had just undergone serious reinforcement to protect against a terrorist attack. Aerial photographs confirm this, as indeed does Defense Secretary Rumsfeld who said the plane “penetrated three of the five concentric rings of the building”. That means the plane had to smash through six outer walls. Could an aircraft not designed structurally to stay intact on impact, the gather skeptics ask, have been able to score through three reinforced rings of buildings and still be so intact that it could have caused the hole on the other side. The official version is a blaze of apparent contradictions. It says that when the plane struck the building it “pulverized”; the disappearance of the engines and other solid components can be explained by the fact they “melted”; the absence of 100 tons of metal is that the inferno was so hot at more then 2,500 degrees centigrade that everything “evaporated”; the little exit hole, around ten feet across, was caused by the nose of engine of the aircraft, which had penetrated three reinforced buildings despite all the former. I find it rather difficult to accept that all of those statements can be true!”1 says the author of Alice in Wonderland and 9/11.

Twin Towers

Now I'm going to talk about what happened in New York. On the fateful morning of 9/11 the World Trade Centers were hit by two planes and brought down. The collapse of the towers stunned the engineering community. Why were they surprised? Because no skyscraper had ever collapsed due to fire or other damage, yet 3 skyscrapers fell on September 11, 2001. The first plane was caught only by a few cameras there were all a fair distance away. All of them show a bright flash right before the plane hits the building. Many people say this flash is just the explosion of the plane hitting the building. Could this be? Many other people say a missile was launched from the plane, seconds before the plane itself hit the building. The cameras show what seems to be extra equipment on the bottom of the plane. This could be the equipment necessary to shoot a missile. This could not be a reflection because the flash was caught on cameras from four different angles. Skeptics say “the most plausible explanation for the flashes we've seen is that the kinetic energy of the collisions vaporized a mix of materials, including steel and aluminum, which were rapidly oxidized by the pressure and heat of the 400 mph collision.

But when Popular Mechanics published an article debunking the 10 most prevalent conspiracy theories, the "flash" theory was not amongst them.

But other skyscrapers have been hit by a plane. Why did the World Trade Centers go down?

Many people believe the collapse of the towers was a controlled demolition. This is because the way the towers collapsed on their own base. They seemed to just collapse upon themselves. When buildings fall no on purpose, they usually lean to one side. These towers did not fall like this.

Page 1 of 2 | Prev 12Next»
1
Liked It
I Like It!
Related Articles
9/11: What are We Supposed to Believe?  |  Post 9/11 G.I. Bill
Latest Articles in Politics
Wikipedia's War on Israel  |  DC Vote
Comments (3)
#1 by I'm the author, Aug 12, 2007
I'm the author of this and I think it is great!!
#2 by EdRoberts, Sep 18, 2007
I, along with the ENTIRE WORLD saw two planes on LIVE TELEVISION, flown by Muslim religious nuts, crash into and bring down the Towers; as I do not like Bush, I am sorry to say it WAS NOT him. The Pentagon? Barbara Olsen and the others were riding in a plane when they crashed into the Pentagon and died, not sitting astraddle a missile. Period. End of conspiracy theory - sorry.
#3 by Author, Mar 2, 2008
But look at the evidence, the hole in the pentagon was way to small, street lights the were "knocked" down by the plane don't have dents in them, tons of money was made by betting that the American Airlines stocks would go down, the buildings looked like they were a controlled demolition, the osama confession tape has lots of erros such as he is wearing a gold ring, which museums are forbidden to do so, and it shows him writing with his right hand, even though according to the FBI he is left handed....how much more do I have to list?
Post Your Comment:
Name:  
Copy the code into this box:  
Inside Socyberty

Activism

 /

Advice

 /

Crime

 /

Death

 /

Disabled

 /

Economics

 /

Education

 /

Ethnicity

 /

Folklore

 /

Future

 /

Gay & Lesbians

 /

Government

 /

History

 /

Holidays

 /

Issues

 /

Languages

 /

Law

 /

Lifestyle Choices

 /

Men

 /

Military

 /

Organizations

 /

Paranormal

 /

People

 /

Philanthropy

 /

Philosophy

 /

Politics

 /

Psychology

 /

Relationships

 /

Religion

 /

Sexuality

 /

Social Sciences

 /

Society

 /

Sociology

 /

Spirituality

 /

Subcultures

 /

Support Groups

 /

Work


Popular Tags
Popular Writers
Socyberty
About Us
Terms of Use
Privacy Policy
Services
Submit an Article
Advertise with Us
Contact

© 2007 Copyright Stanza Ltd. All Rights Reserved.