Learning is not spray paint. You don't enter a school and
it automatically covers you in knowledge. Learning requires
active participation.
Most people don't know how to learn. They memorize. They
read their texts over and over, and as long as a question
matches the words they have forced into their mind they
can answer. If a question is phrased in such a way to
demand thought, they become catatonic.
In learning a difficult Italian Aria, a soprano doesn't have
to know Italian, just how to get the syllables and the notes
to match. So too, a large number of students. They can
rattle off long theorems but haven't a clue what they are
talking about.
To learn means to make that information part of your
consciousness. To be able to visualize, to see the
connections between new information and old.
Just as you can watch a television serial and remember the
names of the characters and the plots from year to year
without conscious effort, so too can you learn all the rulers
of England, philosophies, scientific theorems.
The question is how do you learn? How did you come to learn
all about that television serial? Surely you didn't sit down
with a text, a notebook, a pen, watch, transcribe, study.
Somehow the information painlessly entered your brain.
How did that happen?
Children are taught "nursery rhymes" to teach them how to
learn. They hear something over and over, it becomes
familiar, they repeat it. They can move from nursery rhymes
to the Alphabet, to numbers, using the same repetition,
memorization they used for the rhyme.
But there has to come a point where they can go from
A = Apple to realizing that the same sound the 'A' makes
there is the same sound it makes with Avocado, and that
if Apple begins with an "A", then Avocado must begin with
an "A".
That jump is the blue print for how one learns. Until one
can make the jump, one has not learned. One has memorized.
The way to provoke the "jump" is when one can find an "old"
bit of information and match it to a "new" bit; as with the
letter "A".
If one reads history as a bunch of unconnected events
happening randomly, one will never learn History. They might
memorize a few dates, connect a few incidents, but history
will remain an indecipherable montage.
Historical television programs have done a great deal in
spreading (mis)information. You "see" Cleopatra or Queen
Elizabeth I, or Shaka Zulu, and become interested in the
character, the plot, the dialog, and so you open yourself
to participation in the presentation.
It is this opening of your intellect to this drama which
puts things in a logical order, and makes it "live'.
Because you have "seen" it, you can remember it visually.
If you also read along with the program, you gain nuances
which might have been left out or twisted by the producers.
Other subjects are more difficult to visualize.
In science, for example, an experiment can prove or disprove
a theory. You can see, for example, that raw meat doesn't
make maggots, that maggots are made when flies lay their eggs
in raw meat.
In English you need to hear the words pronounced, defined,
and used, so as to create that template in your mind. Hearing
a word like persiflage will only make sense to you, and
become part of your vocabulary if you use it in a sentence
correctly.
You can not think about what you can not find words for.
Hence, until persiflage is performed, you might not realise
it exists.
Sometimes one will create a word to describe something for
which they do not have the word; depending on their
vocabulary they may coin a phrase or be incomprehensible,
but the fact that a brain is being utilized can not be
denigrated.
An example of learning is using a piece of rubber tire as
a door hinge.
One has seen a door hinge, one has extrapolated how it
works, one sees a piece of old tire. One nails one piece
to the frame, another to the door. The door can open and
close. Depending on the size of the door, the thickness
of the tire, one might have to use two or three pieces.
Yes, it doesn't work as well as an actual hinge, but the
fact that one has been able to appreciate the properties
of the hinge, that is learning.
and learning. I can have you memorise ten nonsense words. They
will stay in your mind for a very short time because you have
nothing to connect a \\\'yim\\\' to... but, five minutes after you
memorised the ten, in a kind of sing song...puk/rekly/mund/---yim/
dut....so that it becomes a \\\'hickory dickory\\\' you can repeat them
in order. To remember them beyond a few minutes, one has to make
the connection. So one might think, hockey puck, rek(less)ly/(ed)mund.....(yumpin )yim(eny)dut(y).
By connecting the nonsense words to something \\\'tangible\\\' they
move from \\\'hickory dickory\\\' to the \\\'Brook was married to
Ridge before she married..\\\' realm where it will never be forgotten.
Students, who can fascinate themselves with soap operas have
to be moved to the level where they can see the interconnections
and the new information forms a chain with the old. But they
have to be able to fit it into their existent world view.
Discordant information, something new and unexpected, becomes
a platypus.. first scorned, rejected, marveled at, accepted.