Amidst the everyday throes of humanity one observantly alludes to varietal differences prevalent amongst us, satisfying life's eternal ebbing movement. Life sojourns forward thriving on choices we make, its successes or failures, matters not, for eventually its succinct psyche will prevail. We make decisions by what we feel is right. But what is right? Is right what we've been taught by our family's generational pedigree, our church, our country, predetermined situations and experiences. Or is it just a fair and preconceived concept of spiritual morality brought on by socialized idiomystical beliefs and understandings. Most of us adhere to a specific spirituality taught or exacted upon us through our familial upbringing and enlightening doctrinal teachings and interactions.
Creating this query - Why is it, with so many religious ideologies and freedoms, do we find ourselves in an abyss of theoretical religiosity? We live our daily lives with microbial understanding of religious judgmentalistic values and prejudice, circumstantial acts with little or no theological consciousness. Each feels his religious ideologic doctrines are of utmost theological integrity spewing millenial controversy of imperative differences endearing spiritual separation.
Rendering emotional indifferences, incarnate absolution, virtual misery and mistrust for the multitudes. If there is but one God, one true and jealous God, why are there so many theological views, why is it that one feels his religion is right and will succumb to no other, why are there so many misinterpretations and misunderstandings. Why violence, deceit, confusion and death subterfuged in and of an ethereal motive, why does hate and uneasiness reign within this world and will we ever be free of these doctrinal overtones? We have wars over these religiostic precepts, we create and nurture hate, anger, bitterness within our everyday lives solving or satisfying no one's empirical view.
A few of our religious leaders have earnestly gone forth throughout human history with persuasive fervor to correct the sins of man. But were their coordinative effort - futile or appropriate, juxtaposes our scrutiny of the intentions of our present religious leaders. Only time will tell. A decision made by one governing the masses is one intricate, intrinsic and tolerable opinion not necessarily accepted, viewed or decreed by all. Thus a responsive effect could easily be misconstrued as an erroneous variant of order, when in fact, one may very well refuse to follow established protocol.
We live, adjust and readjust to the rhetorical standards found befitting and beneficial to our lifestyle. I definitely do not believe this is what and how our sacred leaders of old intended, invariably straining many religiostic relations. Because of this misinterpretation, innumerable relationships are affected by an opinionated difference, possibly a refusal to understand in accordance with one's miniscule pride or principle. I am certainly convinced that this is not what Jesus taught the multitudes!
So, if God is omnisciently omnipotent, what, may I ask, is He seeing?
